Early thoughts on a new Mac convert

My owner recently dipped a toe into the Mac world after thirty years of dos/Windows. He is very hard to please and has some pet hates such as unnecessary mouse travel (whereas I like mouse travel, as long as it is in my direction!) and poor use of screen real estate, and expressions like "screen real estate"!

So, he really doesn't like it that OS X uses up a whole bar at the top of the screen for a menu and assorted other icons, and he likes it even less that if a window is open in the lower right of the screen, he has to navigate his mouse all the way to the top left to access any of the menus! I think he has a point, especially as screens get wider and wider!

On the other hand, he really does like that his OS X runs on a Macbook Air and they are so much nicer than the 17" luggable Windows laptop that he used for the past couple of years, although even that is lightweight compared to the Compaq "suitcase" from the eighties (do you remember that? I certainly don't)! 

And he really likes Divvy, enabling him to resize windows in many flexible ways at the drop of a keystroke - even better than the built-in Windows 7 left/right/max alternative, and a huge time saver. Just think how much of your life you have spent over the years simply resizing windows!

So although he can be a bit grumpy at times, he's actually quite pleased with his initial experiences of OS X and the Mac (Air) world.

The numbers game

After hearing that US President Bush yesterday paid a visit to Iraq, unannounced, and to a remote location - most of the Anbar Province is desert - unlike the troops he sends to the front, and reading how the American press have treated the British withdrawal from the centre of Basra unfavourably, I was prompted to review the casualty figures as published by the UK Ministry of Defence.

As of mid-August 2007, the number of British military casualties (i.e. killed) is on course to be the highest in a calendar year since - and including - the year of the war itself, 2003.
Furthermore, this year, 2007, is already the most costly for 'seriously injured' casualties.
[both stats come from this MOD single sheet]

And turning to Afghanistan,

The number of British military casualties is also on course to be the highest in a calendar year since - and including - 2001, when troops were first sent in.
And, as with Iraq, this year, 2007, is already the most costly for 'seriously injured' casualties.
[both stats come from this MOD single sheet]

These facts - that the rate of casualties is higher than ever - do not figure very highly when the Government reports on progress in these countries. I wonder why.

Note also that the term wounded has been replaced by injured. You can be injured at work, or playing sports, or doing DIY at home. Wounded is what you get on the battlefield, but that is too honest a word to use. Nowadays the wounded are simply referred to as being injured. It's one of those many subtle ways in which we're being told not only what to think, but how to think.

So far, 238 military have died in Iraq and Afghanistan, and 276 have been seriously wounded*. This doesn't count those who have been less seriously injured (i.e. just plain wounded), or mentally scarred. There will be many, many more of those.

The only comparable military operation in recent decades has been the Falklands, which was over within a couple of months, objective accomplished, with 258 killed and 777 wounded. Very soon, in all likelihood before Christmas, the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan will prove to be the most costly in British military terms since the Korean war over half a century ago.

We fought in the Korean War after North Korea invaded South Korea. We fought in the South Atlantic after Argentina invaded the Falklands. We are fighting in Iraq because we started a pre-emptive war, and we're still there 4 years later. Spot the difference.

*this in itself is testament to the good work done saving lives. In wars gone by, the number of wounded was many time higher than those killed in action; these days the ability to save lives in the battlefield has greatly improved, although we mustn't forget this means people having to see out the rest of their lives badly wounded, a not particularly satisfactory outcome.

A new way of looking at familiar things

I have just finished reading the book by Neil Gershenfeld entitled "When Things Start to Think" which covers such futuristic things as electronic paper, computers-in-a-shoe and cellos without strings.

What really struck a chord as to how technology could affect us was saved until the final few pages: right now the price of vehicle insurance is based mostly on crude demographics. With cars containing ever-more powerful computing abilities, what if you are a safe driver and you allow your car insurance company to have access to data from your car that confirms that? You could pay less (or more) than the person in the car in front. The choice as to driving style would still be yours, but the premium you pay would be based on you and not the group into which the insurance company placed you. Equally, how about your life assurance premium being based on the information your smart fridge imparts? Eat well, pay less. Again, the choice would remain yours, but the price you pay would be specific to you and you alone. Many potential problems with these scenarios, but thought provoking all the same.

Finally, a quote from the book: "Privacy is not an absolute good; what matters is making a sensible trade-off between private and shared interests."

A new guest

Last year there were baby foxes in the garden; this year a squirrel. Given the name 'Nutty', he is a regular visitor and dines well on peanuts. He is teaching me patience and I hope I am teaching him polite table manners!

Word of the Day - Puttee

I went to bed the other night having learnt a new word which I hadn't know at the start of the day!
Showing my ignorance, I'd never heard of the word puttee before. Now I know it is a covering for the lower leg, consisting of a long narrow piece of cloth wound spirally, and fastened by a tape. For infantrymen the winding commences at the ankle, but mounted men reverse the process as the rubbing against the khorse causes the tape to come undone. Worn by most armies except the Germans in 1918, they have gradually disappeared form use. The name is adapted from the Hindu patti, meaning 'strip of cloth.' [with thanks to Encylopaedia Britannica]

Giving Blood

It's that time again. I have made an appointment to give blood again next week, one of the few good and charitable things I do. Back when I first started giving it was twice a year, the needles were as big as straws and you were given a cup of tea afterwards for your troubles. You still get the cup of tea, but the needles have shrunk and so has the time between donations.

If you don't yet give, do consider it. You'll feel good having done so and someone, somewhere, will be truly grateful that you did.

Once - by Morris Gleitzman

I bought this book for a friend's child and over the course of a couple of hours late last night and this morning I read it myself.

I agree with the readers comments on Amazon.co.uk that this is a riveting read for adults. Gleitzman manages to convey so much meaning (to adults, who know what the book is about) in so few words. I am a bit nervous of the effect it will have on children because it isn't light-hearted subject matter, but I suspect it is a very good way to educate a child about this part of our relatively recent history.

If you get the chance to read the book, please do. It doesn't take long, but it will leave lingering thoughts in your mind for a long time.